Applications
Business systems, custom software, versions, supportability and the business processes they enable.
A technology audit examines applications, infrastructure, cloud, security, data, licensing, vendors, technical debt and operating controls so leadership can separate material issues from background noise and move into focused action.
Focus the transaction team on the technology evidence, dependencies and decisions that can materially affect value, continuity and execution.
The audit should connect applications, infrastructure, security, data, licensing and operating ownership so material risk shows up in business context rather than as disconnected technical observations.
Business systems, custom software, versions, supportability and the business processes they enable.
Hosting, networks, resilience, observability, cost profile and operating constraints.
Identity, access, vulnerabilities, security tooling, policies and incident readiness.
Critical datasets, ownership, quality, access patterns and dependency between systems.
Commercial commitments, renewal risk, supplier dependence and rights that may not transfer cleanly.
Key-person dependency, documentation, delivery routines and service ownership after close.
Move from raw evidence to decisions the deal team can act on without overstating certainty or hiding the assumptions behind the conclusion.
Use architecture, inventories, contracts, system access, logs, documentation and stakeholder interviews.
State what is weak, outdated, uncontrolled, unsupported or structurally difficult to change.
Show how the finding affects continuity, cost, scalability, security, deal value or integration effort.
Differentiate between immediate remediation, post-close prioritization and longer-term improvement.
Separate immediate exposure from near-term remediation and longer-horizon improvement so the audit drives disciplined decision-making instead of creating a flat list of problems.
High business impact with immediate action required, such as exposed security risk, unsupported production dependency or continuity weakness.
Important risk or structural constraint that should enter the near-term roadmap and post-close planning.
Lower-immediacy issues that need visibility, ownership and timing rather than reactive escalation.
Optimization or modernization work that becomes more useful when sequenced after urgent exposures are addressed.
Use the audit to create a practical action sequence rather than a static findings deck. The point is not just visibility. It is motion.
Address access, backup, critical security risk, unsupported dependencies, single points of failure and other urgent continuity issues.
Improve documentation, service ownership, monitoring, vendor dependencies, recurring incidents and visible technical debt.
Plan architecture improvement, modernization, lifecycle upgrades, tooling changes and capability-building where the business case is clear.
Each advisory path addresses a different transaction technology question while staying connected to the same evidence-to-execution model.
Bring the objective, constraint or technology decision in front of you. We’ll help clarify the path forward and the right level of support.